Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.
KMID : 1148120110010020070
Journal of Advanced Spine Surgery
2011 Volume.1 No. 2 p.70 ~ p.76
Analysis of Biomechanical and Clinical Results of Cervical Arthroplasty using Bryan, Prestige LP and Prodisc - C: an in vivo study
Kim Seok-Woo

Paik Sang-Hoon
Nam Ji-Hoon
Abstract
Purpose: To compare change in biomechanical function at operated and adjacent segments and clinical results after inserting three different designs of cervical artificial arthroplasty devices

Material and Method: Retrospective analysis was performed for 60 patients who had undergone single level cervical artificial arthroplasty in authors¡¯ hospital from November 2003 to January 2010. Bryan, Prestige LP and Prodisc?C artificial discs were used in 34, 17 and 9 patients respectively. We compared preoperative and postoperative biomechanical function of operated and adjacent segments radiographically and clinical results using VAS and NDI.

Results: Biomechanical results showed as follows: range of motion(ROM) of operated and overall cervical spine was well maintained postoperatively regardless of type of devices; Prodisc ? C showed statistically significant recovery of sagittal alignment at the operated segment compared to preoperative status(p=0.021); adjacent level just inferior to the operated segment showed decrease in postoperative ROM with Bryan(p=0.000); anterior intervertebral height also decreased at that segment(p=0.001); no difference showed with VAS and NDI in the three artificial disc devices.

Conclusion: Clinical results of cervical artificial arthroplasty did not show significant difference during the follow-up period, but there were statistically significant changes in biomechanical function. Therefore, adequate selection of disc device is important in cervical arthroplasty.
KEYWORD
Artificial disc, Design, Factor analysis, Biomechanical study
FullTexts / Linksout information
Listed journal information